Table of Contents
Estimation of Reinforcement Quantity in RCC Structure
Estimation of steel reinforcement quantity is required for calculating cost of RCC structure along with other building materials as per construction drawing. Accurate quantities of the concrete and brickwork can be calculated from the layout drawings.
If working drawings and schedules for the reinforcement are not available it is necessary to provide an estimate of the anticipated quantities. The quantities are normally described in accordance with the requirements of the Standard method of measurement of building works.
In the case of reinforcement quantities the basic requirements are:
1. Bar reinforcement should be described separately by steel type (e.g. mild or high-yield steel), diameter and weight and divided up according to:
(a) Element of structure, e.g. foundations, slabs, walls, columns, etc., and
(b) Bar ‘shape’, e.g. straight, bent or hooked; curved; links, stirrups and spacers.
2. Fabric (mesh) reinforcement should be described separately by steel type, fabric type and area, divided up according to 1(a) and 1(b) above.
Methods of Reinforcement Quantity Estimation
There are different methods for estimating the quantities of reinforcement;, three methods of varying accuracy are:
Method-1 for Reinforcement Estimation
The simplest method is based on the type of structure and the volume of the reinforced concrete elements. Typical values are, for example:
- Warehouses and similarly loaded and proportioned structures: 1 tonne of reinforcement per 105m3
- Offices, shops, hotels: 1 tonne per 13.5m3
- Residential, schools: 1 tonne per 15.05m3
However, while this method is a useful check on the total estimated quantity it is the least accurate, and it requires considerable experience to break the tonnage down to Standard Method of Measurement requirements.
Method-2 for Reinforcement Estimation
Another method is to use factors that convert the steel areas obtained from the initial design calculations to weights, e.g. kg/M2 or kg/m as appropriate to the element.
If the weights are divided into practical bar diameters and shapes, this method give a reasonably accurate assessment. The factors, however, do assume a degree of standardization both of structural form and detailing.
This method is likely to be the most flexible and relatively precise in practice, as it is based on reinforcement requirements indicated by the initial design calculations.
Method-3 for Reinforcement Estimation:
For this method sketches are made for the ‘typical’ cases of elements and then weighted.
This method has the advantages that:
(a) The sketches are representative of the actual structure
(b) The sketches include the intended form of detailing and distribution of main and secondary reinforcement
(c) An allowance of additional steel for variations and holes may be made by inspection.
This method can also be used to calibrate or check the factors described in method 2 as it takes account of individual detailing methods.
When preparing the reinforcement estimate, the following items should be considered:
(a) Laps and starter bars
A reasonable allowance for normal laps in both main and distribution bars and for starter bars has shall be considered. It should however be checked if special lapping arrangements are used.
(b) Architectural features
The drawings should be looked at and sufficient allowance made for the reinforcement required for such ‘non-structural’ features.
A contingency of between 10% and 15% should be added to cater for some changes and for possible omissions.